摘要
目前為止，我國雖然具有相當的「事實主權」，卻尚未廣泛地被國際社會所接受，也就是無法取得「法理主權」的依據。因此，本文欲以「聯合國觀察員」作為研究的主軸。首先回顧我國退出聯合國的歷史背景，探討我國是以「中華民國」名義重返聯合國，或者以「台灣」名義重新加入聯合國的兩個途徑；文章中也將與第三條途徑做一個橫切面的分析，即藉由從觀察員身分加入聯合國作為首要參與國際社會的核心下，審視聯合國會員國與觀察員的比較，該如何推動我國以觀察員的身分加入聯合國？而以聯合國觀察員的身分參與是否更有利我國在國際政治的角色。
關鍵字：聯合國觀察員、法律分析、政策途徑、公民投票、WHA觀察員
ABSTRACT
Therefore, this article wants by “the United Nations observer” to take the research the main axle. First reviews Taiwan to withdraw from United Nations's historical perspective, discusses our country is the name returns to the United Nations by “Republic of China”, or the name joins United Nations's two ways by “Taiwan”; In the article will also make a cross section with the third way the analysis. Furthermore, joins United Nations from the observer identity to take the most important participation international society under the core, carefully examines the United Nations member nation and observer's comparison, how should impel our country to join the United Nations by observer's identity? But by the United Nations observer's identity participation whether more advantageous our country in international politics role.
Keywords: UN observers; legal review; policy approach; referendum; WHA observers
|